f Post-Approval Studies (PAS) Database
  • Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Post-Approval Studies (PAS) Database

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-

The FDA has the authority to require sponsors to perform a post-approval study (or studies) at the time of approval of a premarket approval (PMA), humanitarian device exemption (HDE), or product development protocol (PDP) application. Post-approval studies can provide patients, health care professionals, the device industry, the FDA and other stakeholders information on the continued safety and effectiveness (or continued probable benefit, in the case of an HDE) of approved medical devices. This database allows you to search Post-Approval Study information by applicant or device information.

Learn more...


           

Long term


Suggest Enhancement / Report Issue | export reports to excelExport to Excel
General
Study Status Completed
Application Number /
Requirement Number
P000039 / PAS001
Date Original Protocol Accepted 12/05/2001
Date Current Protocol Accepted 08/16/2007
Study Name Long term
Device Name THE AMPLATZER(R) SEPTAL OCCLUDER (ASO) AND THE AMPLATZER EXCHANGE SYSTEM
General Study Protocol Parameters
Study Design Prospective Cohort Study
Data Source Sponsor Registry
Comparison Group Historical Control
Analysis Type Descriptive
Study Population Infant: 29 days-2 yrs, Child: 2-12 yrs, Adolescent: 13-18 yrs, Transit. Adolescent B (as adults) : 18-21 yrs, Adult: >21
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters
Study Objectives This study is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-site clinical study design. The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate the incidence of hemodynamic compromise and to obtain long-term survival data on patients implanted with the AMPLATZER Septal Occluder.
Study Population Study Population: Patients implanted with the AMPLATZER Septal Occluder device. Indication: The AMPLATZER Septal Occluder device is also indicated in patients who have undergone a fenestrated Fontan procedure and who now require closure of the fenestration.
Sample Size 256 patients, 33 sites
Key Study Endpoints The objective of the study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Amplatzer Septal Occluder device. The safety endpoints includes: 1) The incidence of System-Related Adverse Events by patient. System-Related and 2) Adverse Events are defined in the Definitions Section. The effectiveness endpoing include the percentage of patients for whom Closure Success was achieved.
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up Patients enrolled in the study will be evaluated pre-procedure, at implant post device deployment, pre-discharge, and at one month, one year, and two years post-implant. Patient data will be obtained at the time of visit and/or if appropriate through a telephone interview. A follow-up visit at the site is required for the pre-procedure, at implant post device deployment, pre-discharge and one month visits.
Interim or Final Data Summary
Actual Number of Patients Enrolled 1,000 subjects
Actual Number of Sites Enrolled 50 sites
Patient Follow-up Rate At two years the follow-up rate was 93.1% (931/1000).
Final Safety Findings Primary Endpoint:
Hemodynamic compromise related to the device at two years: 0.65% (6/928, upper bound of exact 95%
CI: 1.40%). This rate is below the performance goal was 1.65%.
Rate of hemodynamic compromise related to the device: 35 per 10,000 subject-years.

Co-Primary Safety Endpoint:
Device- or delivery system-related adverse events at two years: 6.56% (61/930, 95% CI: 5.05% - 8.35%)

Three subjects developed cardiac erosions during the two years of the study (0.3% (3/1000) or 15 per
10,000 subject-years).

Secondary Endpoint #1:
Hemodynamic compromise event rates by size (appropriate or under/oversized) at 2 years:
-Appropriate: 0.19% (1/518)
-Under/oversized: 1.4% (5/356)

Secondary Endpoint #2:
Hemodynamic compromise by high/low implanting physicians:
-High implanting: 0.33% (1/307)
-Low implanting: 0.69% (4/583)
Final Effect Findings Co-Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Closure success at two years: 97.87% (966/987, 95% CI: 96.8% - 98.7%)
Study Strengths & Weaknesses This study met its performance goal and had a large sample size. The study also had a low rate of attrition, thus minimizing selection bias. However, this study was not designed adequately to detect rare adverse events, such as cardiac erosion. Postmarket surveillance under Section 522 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act is being conducted to address safety concern related to erosion events (PS130046).
Recommendations for Labeling Changes A labeling change is recommended to add a summary of the post-approval study results including study strengths and limitations. The updated label will reflect the long-term (2 years) postmarket performance of the device.


Long term Reporting Schedule

Reporting Schedule
Report
Date Due
FDA Receipt
Date
Applicant's Reporting Status
6 month report 02/11/2008 02/11/2008 On Time
1year report 08/16/2008 08/06/2008 On Time
18 month report 02/16/2009 02/17/2009 On Time
2 year report 08/16/2009 08/13/2009 On Time
30 month report 02/16/2010 02/16/2010 On Time
3 year report 08/16/2010 08/12/2010 On Time
42 month report 02/16/2011 02/16/2011 On Time
4 year report 08/16/2011 08/16/2011 On Time
54 month report 02/16/2012 02/16/2012 On Time
5 year report 08/16/2012 08/16/2012 On Time
66 month report 02/16/2013 02/14/2013 On Time
6 year report 08/16/2013 08/14/2013 On Time
78 month report 02/16/2014 02/12/2014 On Time
Final Report 12/31/2014 12/19/2014 On Time
amendment to final report 09/25/2015 09/25/2015 On Time


Contact Us

Mandated Studies Program
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Ave.
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Email: MandatedStudiesPrograms@fda.hhs.gov

Additional Resources

-
-