|
General |
Study Status |
Completed |
Application Number / Requirement Number |
P090029 S003/ PAS002 |
Date Original Protocol Accepted |
02/13/2018
|
Date Current Protocol Accepted |
07/12/2019
|
Study Name |
PRESTIGE LP 2-Level Metal Concentrations
|
Device Name |
PRESTIGE LP(TM) CERVICAL DISC
|
General Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design |
Prospective Cohort Study
|
Data Source |
New Data Collection
|
Comparison Group |
No Control
|
Analysis Type |
Descriptive
|
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Objectives |
a one-arm cohort study
|
Study Population |
Patients diagnosed with degenerative disc disease and two (2) contiguous levels in the cervical spine from C3 to C7 and implanted with Prestige LP
|
Sample Size |
30 subjects
|
Key Study Endpoints |
The main study end-point is assessment of metal concentrations (titanium, vanadium, and aluminum) and their changes over time in blood serum. Additional Study endpoints are as follows: Overall success rate with overall success defined as: NDI score improvement of at least 15 points from baseline Maintenance or improvement in neurological status No serious AE classified as implant associated/related or implant/surgical procedure associated/related No secondary surgical procedure classified as a treatment “failure” o Neck Disability Index (NDI) score improvement from baseline; o Neurological Status change from baseline o Neck and Arm Pain score change from baseline o Safety of the PRESTIGE LP™ Cervical Disc as reported through AEs and secondary surgeries.
|
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
12 months
|
Interim or Final Data Summary |
Actual Number of Patients Enrolled |
25 subjects enrolled, 26 subjects have been treated and in follow-up. (8 subjects failed screening, 1 dropped out)
|
Actual Number of Sites Enrolled |
5
|
Patient Follow-up Rate |
72% @ 3mo; 68% @ 6mo; 79.2% @ 12mo.
|
Final Safety Findings |
No major safety concerns observed from limited study
|
Study Strengths & Weaknesses |
Protocol modified to increase enrollment results in some confounding factors, small sample size. COVID19 pandemic also introduced follow-up challenges and reduced data points.
|