|
General |
Study Status |
Progress Adequate |
Application Number |
P200031 / PAS001 |
Date Current Protocol Accepted |
 
|
Study Name |
PROTECT Continuation PAS
|
General Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design |
Prospective Cohort Study
|
Data Source |
External Registry
|
Comparison Group |
No Control
|
Analysis Type |
Descriptive
|
Study Population |
Transit. Adolescent A (distinctively) : 18-21 yrs,
Transit. Adolescent B (as adults) : 18-21 yrs,
Adult: >21
|
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design Description |
This study is a continued follow-up of the OCS Liver PROTECT trial (premarket) cohort, designed to evaluate longer-term outcomes after liver transplantation in the OCS and control (cold storage) arms.
|
Study Population Description |
Patients who were randomized to OCS or control arms and transplanted in the PROTECT trial
|
Sample Size |
300 patients who were randomized to OCS or control arms and transplanted in the PROTECT trial
|
Data Collection |
Main effectiveness endpoint: Liver graft survival at 24 months post-transplant
Other endpoint: patient survival at 24 months post-transplant
|
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
2 years
|
Interim or Final Data Summary |
Actual Number of Patients Enrolled |
300
|
Actual Number of Sites Enrolled |
20
|
Patient Follow-up Rate |
93.6%
|
Final Safety Findings |
N/A
|
Final Effect Findings |
The Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Liver Graft Survival rates are 97% in both OCS and SOC arms for mITT & PP analysis groups with a log rank p-value of 0.96. The Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Recipient Survival rates are 93% (OCS) and 92%(SOC) for both the mITT & PP analysis groups with a log rank p-value of 0.88.
|
Study Strengths & Weaknesses |
A strength of this study is that longer term follow-up data is very complete. A weakness of this study is that the 300 liver transplant recipients were enrolled at 20 sites however, 70% of the liver transplant recipients were enrolled at four of the clinical sites, therefore, the results of these four sites are driving the results of the overall PAS and thus the results of this PAS may not be generalizable to the liver transplant population at large.
|
Recommendations for Labeling Changes |
Yes
|