f Post-Approval Studies (PAS) Database
  • Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Post-Approval Studies (PAS) Database

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-

The FDA has the authority to require sponsors to perform a post-approval study (or studies) at the time of approval of a premarket approval (PMA), humanitarian device exemption (HDE), or product development protocol (PDP) application. Post-approval studies can provide patients, health care professionals, the device industry, the FDA and other stakeholders information on the continued safety and effectiveness (or continued probable benefit, in the case of an HDE) of approved medical devices. This database allows you to search Post-Approval Study information by applicant or device information.

Learn more...


           

WP01 Long-Term Follow-up PAS


Suggest Enhancement / Report Issue | export reports to excelExport to Excel
General
Study Status Completed
Application Number /
Requirement Number
P200035 / PAS001
Date Original Protocol Accepted 12/09/2021
Date Current Protocol Accepted 04/12/2022
Study Name WP01 Long-Term Follow-up PAS
Device Name OrganOx metra System
General Study Protocol Parameters
Study Design Comprehensive/Linked/RegistryBased Surveillance
Data Source External Registry
Comparison Group Concurrent Control
Analysis Type Descriptive
Study Population Transit. Adolescent B (as adults) : 18-21 yrs, Adult: >21
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters
Study Objectives This study is a continued follow-up of patients from the premarket WP01 clinical trial. Outcomes will be evaluated using data from the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database.

Study Population The subjects of this study will be all the subjects receiving transplants in the WP01 IDE study where UNOS IDs were provided by the site and where subjects have consented to have their information sent to UNOS.

Sample Size Up to 136 of 136 NMP transplants performed and up to 129 of 130 SCS transplants performed (final sample size pending evaluation of the number of patients that have consented to have their information sent to UNOS).
Key Study Endpoints Primary objectives:
To assess graft and subject survival in identified subjects
To assess evidence of biliary complications in identified subjects

Secondary objectives:
To report post-transplant malignancy in identified subjects
To report viral detection in identified subjects
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up Data will be collected on subjects through 36 months post-transplant procedure.

Interim or Final Data Summary
Actual Number of Patients Enrolled 265 (133 NMP and 132 SCS)
Actual Number of Sites Enrolled Not applicable as patients’ data was provided by UNOS
Patient Follow-up Rate Crude Follow-up Rates: 81% NMP and 80% SCS
Final Safety Findings • Causes of subject death were related to malignancies in 6 of the deaths and were presented between 476 and 901 days after transplant. Three cases in the NMP and 3 cases in the SCS arms were reported.
• The bilirubin levels were acceptable because they ranged between 0.240 to 3.500 mg/dL thus not reaching critical values.
• There was one positive result for HBV Core Antibody 381 days post-transplant. This subject was not reported as experiencing graft failure or death in the data provided. All other reported results for post-transplant malignancy and viral detection were negative, not done, or unknown.
Final Effect Findings • No graft failures reported in either arm between 12 and 24 months.
• Four (4) graft failures reported in the NMP arm 3 graft failure reported in the SCS arm from 24 to 36 months
• Kaplan Meier Estimates of Graft Survival – Transplanted and Consented to UNOS Data Collection (As Treated) showed comparable results
between arms at 36-month follow-up (96.9% NMP and 96.8% SCS arms).
• The Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Subject Survival showed higher events free rates in the SCS arm at 36-month follow-up (88.2% NMP and 90.9% SCS arms).
Study Strengths & Weaknesses Strengths: Randomization, Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Subject Survival and Graft Survival show comparable results between the two arms of the study.
Weaknesses: Although the results indicate no concerns related to safety or effectiveness, the sample size was not large enough to detect enough events to evaluate conclusively if there are safety and effectiveness differences between NMP and SCS.
Recommendations for Labeling Changes The study elements and results need to be included in the labeling.


WP01 Long-Term Follow-up PAS Reporting Schedule

Reporting Schedule
Report
Date Due
FDA Receipt
Date
Applicant's Reporting Status
1 year report 02/28/2022 02/28/2022 On Time
18 month report 10/26/2022 10/21/2022 On Time
2 year report/final report 06/30/2023 06/30/2023 On Time


Contact Us

Mandated Studies Program
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Ave.
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Email: MandatedStudiesPrograms@fda.hhs.gov

Additional Resources

-
-