|
|
| General |
| Study Status |
Study Pending |
Application Number / Requirement Number |
P250011 / PAS002 |
| Date Original Protocol Accepted |
12/09/2025
|
| Date Current Protocol Accepted |
 
|
| Study Name |
F/u of the ProVIDE II Bridging Study
|
| Device Name |
ProVee System for BPH
|
| Clinical Trial Number(s) |
NCT05186740 NCT06236802
|
| General Study Protocol Parameters |
| Study Design |
Prospective Cohort Study
|
| Data Source |
New Data Collection
|
| Comparison Group |
No Control
|
| Analysis Type |
Analytical
|
| Study Population |
Adult: >21
|
| Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
| Study Objectives |
This study was initiated prior to device approval and is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized bridging study. It was conducted at 8 sites and enrolled 40 subjects. Forty (40) subjects were implanted in the study. The 3-month outcomes from the study were used to support PMA approval. The 60-months follow-up safety data, and effectiveness data from this study must be submitted to assess the continued safety and effectiveness of the ProVee System for BPH. No greater than 20% of the patients enrolled in the study will be lost to follow up through 60-months. Data must be summarized descriptively, without statistical testing. Patient and physician labeling must be updated annually via a PMA supplement to include the effectiveness and safety outcomes listed above after the patients enrolled in this study complete each annual year of follow up.
|
| Study Population |
Male subject greater than or equal to 45 years old who has symptomatic BPH
|
| Sample Size |
A total of 40 subjects were enrolled in the ProVIDE II Bridging Study.
|
| Key Study Endpoints |
Effectiveness
• Symptom improvement 1 (timeframe: procedure through 60 months) Percent of subjects who experienced at least a 30% improvement in IPSS from baseline from their baseline pre-treatment score annually through 60 months post treatment. • Symptom improvement 2 (timeframe: procedure through 60-months) Percent change in IPSS compared to baseline at all timepoints post treatment. • QoL Questionnaire (timeframe: procedure through 60-months) Mean improvement from baseline in QoL questionnaire annually through 60-months. • Uroflow Metrics 1 (timeframe: 1-month through 60-months) Mean improvement from baseline uroflowmetry measures of peak flow rate (Qmax) as measured at all timepoints. • Uroflow Metrics 2 (timeframe: 1-month through 60-months) Mean improvement from baseline in PVR as measured at all timepoints post treatment. • Re-intervention – device (timeframe: procedure annually through 60-months) post-procedure incidence of secondary reintervention using an alternative surgical LUTS therapy annually through 60 months. • Re-intervention – drug (timeframe: procedure annually through 60-months). Post-procedure incidence of secondary reintervention using standard pharmacological agents for LUTS therapy through 60 months. • Post procedure device removal rate (timeframe: 12-months through 60-months) Rate of post procedure incidence of device removal and summary of the reasons for removal.
Safety
• Adverse Events (Procedure through 5 years) Rate of device or procedure related adverse events at all time points. • Sexual Health Questionnaire (timeframe 3 months through 60-months) Change in sexual health characterized by change in International Index of Erectile Function, specifically the Erectile Function domain (IIEF-5) and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire – Ejaculatory Domain (MSHQ-EjD) at 3 months through 60 months. • Adverse Event Classification (timeframe: procedure through 60-months) Proportion of subjects with adverse events classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade IIIb or higher or any event resulting in persistent disability evidenced through 60-month follow-up visit. • Device removal related adverse events (timeframe: procedure through 60-months) Assessment of retrieval procedure related adverse events related to implant removal.
|
| Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
Follow-up annually through 5 years
|