|
General |
Study Status |
Redesigned/Replaced Study |
Application Number / Requirement Number |
P130021 / PAS001 |
Date Original Protocol Accepted |
01/17/2014
|
Date Current Protocol Accepted |
02/17/2014
|
Study Name |
Contined f/u of IDE pivotal cohort
|
Device Name |
MEDTRONIC COREVALVE SYSTEM
|
Clinical Trial Number(s) |
NCT01240902
|
General Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design |
Prospective Cohort Study
|
Data Source |
New Data Collection
|
Comparison Group |
No Control
|
Analysis Type |
Descriptive
|
Study Population |
Adult: >21
|
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Objectives |
A longitudinal observational clinical trial following subjects that were enrolled in the Medtronic CoreValve® U.S. Pivotal Trial and received the Medtronic CoreValve® System (MCS).
|
Study Population |
Extreme risk subjects currently consented to and enrolled in the Medtronic U.S. Pivotal Trial, and implanted with the MCS.
|
Sample Size |
All subjects enrolled in the US Pivotal Trial, 656 iliofemoral and non-ilifemoral and 63 roll-in subjects in all sites (41).
|
Key Study Endpoints |
The investigational 12-month primary and secondary endpoints have been met and is the basis for FDA approval of the MCS. The following safety/effectiveness endpoints will characterize clinical outcomes annually through 5 years: 1. Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) event rates via Kaplan-Meier. MACCE is defined as a composite of: ¿ all-cause death ¿ myocardial infarction (MI) ¿ all stroke, and ¿ reintervention (defined as any cardiac surgery or percutaneousadjusts, or replaces a previously implanted valve) 2. The occurrence of individual MACCE components event rates via Kaplan-Meier 3. Major Adverse Events (MAE) event rates via Kaplan-Meier 4. Conduction disturbance requiring permanent pacemaker implantation event rates via Kaplan-Meier 5. Change in NYHA class 6. Quality of Life (QoL) change using the following measures: ¿ Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) ¿ SF 12, and ¿ EuroQoL7. Echocardiographic assessment of valve performance using the following measures: ¿ transvalvular mean gradient ¿ effective orifice area ¿ degree of aortic valve regurgitation (transvalvular and paravalvular) 8. Aortic valve disease hospitalization event rates via Kaplan-Meier 9. Cardiovascular deaths and valve-related deaths event rates via Kaplan-Meier 10.Strokes (of any severity) and TIAs event rates via Kaplan-Meier 11.Evidence of prosthetic valve dysfunction
|
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
annually through 5 years
|