|
General |
Study Status |
Delayed |
Application Number / Requirement Number |
P150030 / PAS002 |
Date Original Protocol Accepted |
10/17/2016
|
Date Current Protocol Accepted |
12/07/2018
|
Study Name |
Short to Mid-Term f/u of New US Patients
|
Device Name |
R3 DELTA CERAMIC HIP SYSTEM
|
General Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design |
Prospective Cohort Study
|
Data Source |
New Data Collection
|
Comparison Group |
Historical Control
|
Analysis Type |
Analytical
|
Study Population |
Transit. Adolescent B (as adults) : 18-21 yrs,
Adult: >21
|
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Objectives |
The study design is prospective cohort, new enrollment.
|
Study Population |
The study population is comprised of US patients who receive the device in the post market environment. The comparator group is comprised of patients in the European premarket cohort.
|
Sample Size |
A total of 183 study subjects will be enrolled.
|
Key Study Endpoints |
The primary endpoint is overall study success at 3 years post procedure. Success is defined the same way it was in the premarket cohort, to allow comparison. Overall Success is defined as: No component revision, and Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) of at least 80 points, and No radiographic failure, defined as: No radiolucencies greater than 2 mm in 50% or more in any of the cup or stem zones, no femoral or acetabular subsidence greater than or equal to 5 mm from baseline, and no acetabular cup inclination changes greater than 4 degree.
|
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
Patients will be followed for 3 years
|
Interim or Final Data Summary |
Interim Results |
Number of study sites enrolled 10 sites Number of subjects enrolled 189 subjects Follow-up rate Complete follow-up of patients at 3-years is 90/161 (56%) Summary of Interim Results There were no reports of unanticipated adverse device effects. Four (4) deaths occurred, One (1) failure and revision for recurrent dislocation Strengths and Weaknesses A strength of the study is its adequate power to detect differences in short-term device survival between the US post-market cohort and the European ore-market cohort. A weakness of the study is the absence of long-term follow-up to assess long-term device performance
|