|
General |
Study Status |
Delayed |
Application Number / Requirement Number |
P160036 / PAS003 |
Date Original Protocol Accepted |
09/20/2024
|
Date Current Protocol Accepted |
 
|
Study Name |
TAR Performance Descriptive Study
|
Device Name |
Hintermann Series H3 Total Ankle Replacement System
|
General Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design |
Prospective & Retrospective Study
|
Data Source |
External Registry
|
Comparison Group |
No Control
|
Analysis Type |
Descriptive
|
Study Population |
Adult: >21
|
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Objectives |
Objective: The purpose of this multi-center post-approval study is to meet the conditions of the PMA approval for the H3 TAR, to evaluate the trends in performance among implant sizes, and to assess the outcomes of the primary surgeon of the premarket study that supported PMA approval, compared to other surgeons that are less familiar with the device. Design: Prospective multicenter single arm post approval study with data supplementation from the UK National Joint Registry (UK NJR)
|
Study Population |
Patients who have discussed options for management of a painful arthritic ankle joint due to primary osteoarthritis, post-traumatic osteoarthritis, or arthritis secondary to inflammatory disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, hemochromatosis, etc.), and who have decided to undergo total ankle replacement, are candidates for this study.
|
Sample Size |
US Population: 94 subjects/ 10 Clinical Sites UK Population: 407 subjects / 45 Clinical Sites
|
Key Study Endpoints |
Primary Endpoints for US population: • Survivorship (absence of revision to metal components only) • Survivorship (absence of revision to metal and polyethylene components) Additional Endpoints for US population: • American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score at 2 years or more • Percentage of subjects with a serious device related adverse event, other than a revision or removal within 2 years • Incidence, occurrence, and types of serious device related adverse events • Nature, onset, duration, severity, relationship to the device, relationship to the operative procedure, and outcome of any adverse event • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score • Subjects Satisfaction Surverys • SF-36 • Radiographs (loosening, osteolysis, implant migration, other findings) • Explant analysis UK population: • Survivorship (absence of revision to metal components only) • Survivorship (absence of revision to metal and polyethylene components)
|
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
5 years
|