|
General |
Study Status |
Ongoing |
Application Number / Requirement Number |
P050050 S024/ PAS001 |
Date Original Protocol Accepted |
03/13/2024
|
Date Current Protocol Accepted |
 
|
Study Name |
S.T.A.R. Ankle PAS
|
Device Name |
Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System (S.T.A.R. Ankle)
|
General Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design |
Prospective Cohort Study
|
Data Source |
New Data Collection
|
Comparison Group |
Historical Control
|
Analysis Type |
Analytical
|
Study Population |
Adult: >21
|
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Objectives |
Study Objective: Demonstrate equal or better performance of the STAR TAR system with vitamin E (e+) mobile bearing relative to a historical control with respect to cumulative revision rate at 8 years post implantation. Study Design: Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Comparative Observational Study
|
Study Population |
The study population includes adult subjects (aged 22 years and over) implanted with the STAR TAR System with the e+ mobile bearing for the treatment of painful arthritic ankle joints due to osteoarthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. The comparator is a historical control group consisting of a cumulative revision rate for all fixed bearing ankles from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) at eight (8) years post-implantation.
|
Sample Size |
Number of Patients: 300 evaluable patients Assumptions: The sample size is determined using a precision – based method assuming a revision rate of 4.5% for the STAR TAR system with e+ mobile bearing at 7 years follow-up, a 95% confidence interval with an upper confidence limit of 6.8%, and a type 1 error of 5%. To account for a 20% attrition rate, at least 375 patients will be enrolled in this study. Number of Sites: 8 – 10 US Sites
|
Key Study Endpoints |
Primary Endpoints: • Device cumulative revision rate of the STAR TAR system with e+ mobile bearing at eight (8) years post-implantation. • Within the primary endpoint, a quantitative assessment of the polyethylene fracture rate of the subject device to the historical control data will be performed Secondary Endpoints: • Device revision rate assessed at all timepoints post-implantation • Change from baseline for Total Buechel-Pappas Scale Score • Change from baseline for Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (100mm scale) • Change from baseline for Quality of Life (SF-36) • Change from baseline for American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle Hindfoot Scale Score • Radiographic endpoints (anterior-posterior and lateral x-ray images of the treated ankle) o Quantitative and qualitative radiographic assessment of the total ankle arthroplasty including evaluation of both the femoral and tibial components, for the following outcomes: . radiolucency and osteolysis . subsidence . migration . rotation . integrity. . Assessment of polyethylene bearing for integrity (e.g., fracture, dislocation, subluxation, worn, intact). • Explant analysis of any explanted devices and all revisions • All adverse events including the nature, onset, duration, severity, and relationship to the device and/or procedure
|
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
8 years
|