• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Post-Approval Studies (PAS) Database

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-

The FDA has the authority to require sponsors to perform a post-approval study (or studies) at the time of approval of a premarket approval (PMA), humanitarian device exemption (HDE), or product development protocol (PDP) application. Post-approval studies can provide patients, health care professionals, the device industry, the FDA and other stakeholders information on the continued safety and effectiveness (or continued probable benefit, in the case of an HDE) of approved medical devices. This database allows you to search Post-Approval Study information by applicant or device information.

Learn more...


           

SHIP-Sub-Protocol LMI-001-A-S01


Suggest Enhancement / Report Issue | export reports to excelExport to Excel
General
Study Status Completed
Application Number /
Requirement Number
P160037 S017/ PAS001
Date Original Protocol Accepted 05/14/2024
Date Current Protocol Accepted 03/12/2025
Study Name SHIP-Sub-Protocol LMI-001-A-S01
Device Name BD Onclarity HPV Assay
General Study Protocol Parameters
Study Design Cross-Sectional Study
Data Source New Data Collection
Comparison Group No Control
Analysis Type Descriptive
Study Population Adult: At least 22 yrs
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters
Study Objectives The study will include 500 or more individuals with a cervix, 25 years or older, with referrals to colposcopy based on previous positive HPV test or abnormal cytology results and/or referrals to cervical excisional procedure. The study will provide additional data regarding clinical performance of the BD Onclarity HPV Assay with vaginal specimens in a U.S. population. The clinical sensitivity, clinical specificity and false positive rate and false negative rate in detecting precancer/cancer as well as the corresponding ratio between vaginal and cervical specimens will be evaluated. Additionally, the concordance of the BD Onclarity HPV Assay results between the two specimen types will be evaluated.
Study Population Individuals with a cervix, 25 years or older, who come to colposcopy with a referral based on previous positive HPV test or abnormal cytology results and who come to cervical excisional procedure with a referral. There is no comparison group.
Sample Size 500 or more
Study sites will be 10 or more
Key Study Endpoints The clinical sensitivity, clinical specificity and false positive rate and false negative rate in detecting precancer/cancer as well as the corresponding ratio between vaginal and cervical specimens.

The concordance of the BD Onclarity HPV Assay results between the two specimen types.

Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up No follow-up, unless required for SOC clinical care purposes
Interim or Final Data Summary
Actual Number of Patients Enrolled 554
Actual Number of Sites Enrolled 13
Patient Follow-up Rate N/A
Final Safety Findings No severe adverse events were reported.
Final Effect Findings - The sensitivities of the assay for detecting greater than or equal to CIN2 with self-collected vaginal (SV) and clinician-collected cervical (CC) specimens are 83.7% and 90.7%, respectively, with a ratio of sensitivity (SV:CC) of 0.923.

- The sensitivities of the assay for detecting greater than or equal to CIN3 with SV and CC are 89.2% and 96.9%, respectively, with a ratio of sensitivity (SV:CC) of 0.921.

- The false positive rates of the assay with SV and CC are 68.1% and 59.9%, respectively, with a ratio of false positive rate (SV:CC) of 1.138.

- The specificities of the assay with SV and CC are 31.9% and 40.1%, respectively, with a ratio of specificity (SV:CC) of 0.795.

- For detection of HR HPV, the positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement of SV specimen as compared to CC specimen are 92.4% and 67.9%, respectively.
Study Strengths & Weaknesses Study strength: The study provided additional data regarding clinical performance of the BD Onclarity HPV Assay with vaginal specimens in a U.S. population.

Study weakness: The study subject enrollment was based on cervical sample test result.
Recommendations for Labeling Changes Recommended labeling changes: addition of PAS results as well as appropriate labeling mitigations for the observed performance for self-collected vaginal specimens.


SHIP-Sub-Protocol LMI-001-A-S01 Reporting Schedule

Reporting Schedule
Report
Date Due
FDA Receipt
Date
Applicant's Reporting Status
6 month report 11/12/2024 11/12/2024 On Time
final report 05/28/2025 05/28/2025 On Time


Contact Us

Mandated Studies Program
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Ave.
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Email: MandatedStudiesPrograms@fda.hhs.gov

Additional Resources

-
-