• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LEONHARD LANG GMBH SKINTACT; MULTIFUNCTION DEFIBRILLATION ELECTRO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LEONHARD LANG GMBH SKINTACT; MULTIFUNCTION DEFIBRILLATION ELECTRO Back to Search Results
Model Number DF27N
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Cardiac Arrest (1762)
Event Date 05/07/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
On (b)(6), we have been informed about a potential malfunction with a defibrillation electrode and a laerdal heartstart fr2+ defibrillator.A pt suffered a cardiac arrest.It was reported that when the ambulance crew started cpr the defibrillator stated that it couldn't analyze.This happened twice more (after 2 min intervals).When more ambulance personnel arrived, the defibrillator was replaced, the electrodes were not replaced.Then it worked.The first defibrillator has been inspected afterwards but worked properly.The malfunction was recognized during the procedure which lasted for 30 mins.No pt injury was reported.The pt was described as slim and the skin type as normal.The pt was lying on the back.The pt skin was not cleaned, shaven, dried, disinfected and no ointment had been used.The electrode was adhering well to the pt skin and no repositioning of the applied electrodes were necessary.We have not rec'd any further info so far despite of repeated requests.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Two different lot numbers were provided but not indicated, which one was involved in the incident.These are 40922-0774 or 40918-0771.Retained samples of both lot numbers were inspected visually and tested electrically.The tested devices were found to perform within limits.No faults could be detected.Actually, we are not sure if a malfunction was caused by the defibrillation electrodes used as a rep of the ambulance svc ((b)(4)) stated "(.) the crew changed defibrillator when more ambulance personnel arrived, not the electrodes.Then it worked (.)".We have been asking for add'l info on the incident regarding the model of the 2nd defibrillator used, whether the electrodes had been already placed on the pt when the first defibrillator indicated "no analysis possible", whether the pt was defibrillated, whether the pt was injured due to the therapy delay and how the pt is doing now.We will provide you with this info in a follow up report, once we receive it.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A product specialist met with the complaining customer to further investigate the claimed failure.Based on the manual of the defibrillator the specific error message is not triggered by an electrode malfunction but by other causes.It turned out, the customer had not retrieved the log file from the defibrillator but will try to do so now to confirm the conclusion.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SKINTACT
Type of Device
MULTIFUNCTION DEFIBRILLATION ELECTRO
Manufacturer (Section D)
LEONHARD LANG GMBH
archenweg 56
innsbruck 6020
AU  6020
Manufacturer Contact
burrhus lang
archenweg 56
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
12334257
MDR Report Key4844430
MDR Text Key16307999
Report Number8020045-2015-00046
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MKJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSW
PMA/PMN Number
K072233
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Distributor,distributor,foreign
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/08/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/12/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2017
Device Model NumberDF27N
Device Lot Number40922-0774
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/13/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age22 YR
-
-