This report is not to report a device malfunction, but a patient response to the procedure.Based on information provided, the customer reported complaint description of a noisy ecg signal causing a delay in the procedure is confirmed.The system detected the noisy ecg signal and paused energy delivery.Although the exact root cause of the event is unable to be determined, it does not appear to be the result of a manufacturing or design failure.The nanoknife system functioned as intended.A review of the device history records was performed for the reported serial number (b)(4) for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirmed that the unit met all material, assembly, and performance specification prior to distribution.The disposable nanoknife single electrode probe used during the procedure was disposed of by the healthcare facility and is not available to be returned for evaluation.The single use probes could not cause or contribute to a noisy ecg signal.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.
|
As reported on (b)(6) 2015, a (b)(6) female patient presented for a nanoknife procedure of lesion in the leg.During the procedure, the user experienced "noise" saturation levels on the sync device monitor.During these periods of noise saturation, the nanoknife generator suspended energy pulse delivery until the situation was resolved.This resulted in an increase in ablation delivery time, in turn prolonging the procedure.The patient was under anesthesia the entire time.It was reported the delay caused no harm or injury to the patient.It was reported the customer declined to return the nanoknife system for assessment, as there was no indication the unit malfunctioned.
|