The field application specialist first reported that he had been at this site on (b)(6)2015 to install the rbc folate application on the customer's analyzer.He said that he did not dilute controls for this test in the same manner as patient samples as directed.He stated that running the controls without dilution caused build up in the measuring cell of the analyzer.When the customer ran controls on (b)(6)2010, these were found to be out of range.The analyzer was not in use on (b)(6)2015 and (b)(6)2015.The field service representative checked the analyzer on (b)(6)2015 due to "abnormal measuring cell condition" errors that the customer had been getting.He determined that the analyzer high voltage was out of specification.He adjusted the high voltage so that it was within specifications.The customer ran calibrations and quality controls.After the service actions, the customer repeated approximately (b)(6) patient samples that were tested on (b)(6)2015.The customer mentioned that they issued corrected reports for a total of (b)(6) patient samples.Of the affected samples, the customer provided an example of one patient sample that had an erroneous vitamin b12 (b12) result.The sample initially resulted as approximately 705 pmol/l and this value was reported outside of the laboratory.The sample was repeated on (b)(6)2015, resulting as approximately 425 pmol/l.The repeat result was believed to be correct and a corrected report was issued.The patient was not adversely affected.The b12 reagent lot number and expiration date were asked for, but not provided.A specific root cause could not be determined based on the provided information.The most likely root cause would be related to mishandling of the quality control material.The quality control material could cause a contamination of the measuring cell, which could lead to a signal shift.The customer has not reported any further issues.
|