The customer obtained questionable high test results for 284 patient samples since (b)(6) 2017 using the a1cx-2 tina-quant hemoglobin a1cdx gen.2 whole blood application (hba1c) assay on the cobas integra 800 analyzer (i800).Of the 284 samples pulled and repeated on (b)(6) 2017, 142 samples repeated significantly lower than the initial result.The remaining sample results matched their initial results.Result data was provided for four patients.The customer initially discovered the issue based upon high moving average errors in their middleware, and then via physician complaints.Not all samples had moving average errors.The medical technologist ran quality controls after the high moving average errors, and it was acceptable.All initial results were released outside the laboratory.No instrument data flags or alarms occurred.Corrected reports were issued.Patient a: the initial result was 8.9%; repeat result on another i800 analyzer was 5.3%.Patient b (female, (b)(6)): the initial result was 8.1%; repeat result on another i800 analyzer was 4.96%.Patient c (female, (b)(6)): the initial result was 7.7%; repeat result on another i800 analyzer was 4.8%.Patient d (male, (b)(6)): the initial result was 8.7%; repeat result on another i800 analyzer was 5.5%.Information was provided for two additional patients.One patient was prescribed unspecified medication based upon their results.Another patient was diagnosed with diabetes (type not provided) and prescribed a glucometer.The prescriptions were not filled.Result data from these patients was not provided.No adverse events occurred.The hba1c reagent lot number is 14350601 with an expiration date of 10/31/2017.Calibration and quality controls (qc) were acceptable.A review of the alarm log information found no issues.The field service representative (fsr) was unable to find a cause for the issue.He checked the rotor and workstation alignments which were acceptable.He performed a reagent flow check which passed.The sample flow check failed and he found the sample probe was clogged; however, this did not contribute to the high results.A sample flow check was performed by the customer on (b)(6) 2017 which passed.The fsr replaced the sample probe and the flow check passed.He replaced the tube stopper on the wash station due to leakage.The customer performed qc which passed.Investigation activities are ongoing.
|