Event dates estimated.The patient deaths referenced will be filed under a separate medwatch report #.The patient effects referenced will be filed under a separate medwatch report #.The additional xience referenced will be filed under a separate medwatch report #.The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record and complaint history of the reported lot could not be conducted because the part and lot numbers were not provided.A conclusive cause for the reported difficulty to deploy, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.The udi is unknown as the part and lot numbers were not provided.Article title: comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent in routine pci: three-year clinical outcomes from the aida trial.
|
It was reported through a research article identifying xience that may be related to the following: patient death, myocardial infarction, thrombosis, cardiac arrest, revascularization, rehospitalization, malposition, and stents jailing or occluding vessels.Additionally, it was identified that absorb may be related to the following: patient death, myocardial infarction, thrombosis, dissection, revascularization, rehospitalization, and malposition.This article summarizes clinical outcomes of 1,845 patients that were treated with xience and absorb stents.Specific patient information is documented as unknown.Details are listed in the article, titled "comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent in routine pci: three-year clinical outcomes from the aida trial.".
|