|
Model Number ONXM-31/33 |
Device Problem
Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problem
No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 03/20/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to initial reports, patient with existing onxm-31/33 sn (b)(4) implanted in the mitral position (b)(6) 2020 received onxm-31/33 sn (b)(4), (b)(6) 2020 in the mitral position.This investigation is relegated to onxm-31/33 sn (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
According to initial reports, patient with existing onxm-31/33 sn (b)(6) implanted january 10, 2020 received onxm-31/33 sn (b)(6) march 30, 2020.This complaint is relegated to onxm-31/33 sn (b)(6).Multiple attempts at additional information have gone unmet.The user facility will not release any information without patient consent.The manufacturing records for the onxm-31/33 sn (b)(6) were reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.A review of the available information was performed.Onxm- 31/33 sn (b)(6) was implanted in the mitral position of a 24-year-old male patient on (b)(6) 2020.However, on (b)(6) 2020 (70-days post-implant) this prosthetic valve was explanted and replaced with onxm 31/33 sn (b)(6).Multiple attempts were made to obtain additional information; however, the user facility noted they will not release any information without the patient's consent.Thus.No other information was provided, including the status of the patient.Therefore, we have no evidence to suggest what, if any, contribution the original valve made to the explantation.The instructions for use [ifu] for the on-x valve acknowledge reoperation and explantation as potential consequences of a complication following prosthetic valve replacement.But we have no evidence of any valvular malfunction.There is no evidence to suggest what.If any, relationship the valve had to its explantation.No further action is required without additional information.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to cryolife is accurate or has been confirmed by cryolife.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
According to initial reports, patient with existing onxm-31/33 sn (b)(6) implanted (b)(6) 2020 received onxm-31/33 sn (b)(6) march 30, 2020.This complaint is relegated to onxm-31/33 sn (b)(6).Multiple attempts at additional information have gone unmet.The user facility will not release any information without patient consent.The manufacturing records for the onxm-31/33 sn (b)(6) were reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.A review of the available information was performed.Onxm- 31/33 sn (b)(6) was implanted in the mitral position of a 24-year-old male patient on (b)(6) 2020.However, on (b)(6) 2020 (70-days post-implant) this prosthetic valve was explanted and replaced with onxm 31/33 sn (b)(6).Multiple attempts were made to obtain additional information; however, the user facility noted they will not release any information without the patient's consent.Thus.No other information was provided, including the status of the patient.Therefore, we have no evidence to suggest what, if any, contribution the original valve made to the explantation.The instructions for use [ifu] for the on-x valve acknowledge reoperation and explantation as potential consequences of a complication following prosthetic valve replacement.But we have no evidence of any valvular malfunction.There is no evidence to suggest what.If any, relationship the valve had to its explantation.No further action is required without additional information.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to cryolife is accurate or has been confirmed by cryolife.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|