Qn#(b)(4).The device history record was reviewed for notifications pertaining to incoming inspection, stock checks, and product returns.No concerns were noted with reference to (b)(4).(b)(4) sample of 342025 was received for evaluation.No visual concerns were noted.A dimensional inspection of the spring rod determined that it was on the high side of the specification @ 1.2mm.The device is within specification.A historical review of this device noted that the spring rod was originally specified as 0.8mm ¿0.2mm this was increased to 1.0mm ¿ 0.2mm in 2014.No other complaints have been received in that time frame.Users familiar with or in possession of pre 2014 devices might notice an increase in spring force.Isolated incident.No other complaints have been received for this product line since the changes were made in 2014.A dimensional inspection of the spring rod determined that it was on the high side of the specification @ 1.2mm.The device is within specification.The device functions as expected.No confirmed complaints were received in this range with the same issue.Sap was reviewed for notifications pertaining to incoming inspection, stock checks, and product returns.No concerns were noted with reference to 342050.A historical review of this device noted that the spring rod was originally specified as 0.8mm ¿0.2mm this was increased to 1.0mm ¿ 0.2mm in 2014.No other complaints have been received in that time frame.Users familiar with or in possession of pre 2014 devices might notice an increase in spring force.Isolated incident.No other complaints have been received for this product line since the changes were made in 2014.
|