The valve was reportedly explanted due to aortic regurgitation.The tear was confirmed.Leaflets 2 and 3 (rcc and lcc) were torn from their shared stent post.A small, detached, piece of fibrin thrombus was noted at leaflet 3, which was not considered diagnostically significant.No inflammation or significant calcifications were found.X-ray examination of the stent did not show evidence of deformation, which is consistent with proper handling of the valve at the time of valve insertion.The device history record was reviewed to ensure each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed and the product met all specifications at the time of commercialization.This was inclusive of a review of the manufacturing videos, which contained no evidence of anomalies during functional inspection.In the absence of any calcification or evidence for infection, the reported event is consistent with a non-calcific leaflet tear.A non-calcific leaflet tear is a form of structural valve deterioration (svd), which is a well-known complication from valve replacement surgery.A non-calcific leaflet tear is commonly attributed to increased operational leaflet stress but may also be related to biological factors which result in tissue degeneration characterized by loss of collagen.In this case, histological evaluation did not demonstrate loss of collagen at the tear site and the cause of the leaflet tear could not be conclusively determined; however, that the selected valve size (21 mm) was larger than the replacement valve (19 mm) is possible evidence of oversizing.
|