|
Model Number M00562402 |
Device Problems
Entrapment of Device (1212); Failure to Cut (2587)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation (2001); No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 05/07/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).According to the complainant, the suspect device was not kept and is not available for return.If any further relevant information is received, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a captiflex medium oval flexible snare was used during a colonoscopy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure the snare did not seem like it cut all the way through the tissue.Reportedly, the tissue had to be pulled away with the snare rather than cut.The complainant suspected that the difficult polypectomy may have resulted in a perforation, however it was not confirmed.It is unknown if there were interventions performed or treatment given to the patient for the perforation as no information was provided.It was not reported whether the perforation has been resolved.Although the procedure was reported to be completed, it was not reported how it was completed.The patient's current condition is unavailable per customer.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block h6: problem code 1212 captures the reportable event of loop entrapment.Conclusion code 4316 is being used in lieu of an adequate conclusion code for device not returned.Block h10: according to the complainant, the suspect device was not kept and is not available for return.If any further relevant information is received, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Block h11: blocks b1, b2 and b5 have been updated with the additional information received on (b)(6) 2020.Blocks f10 (patient codes), h1, h6 (patient codes) and h10 have been updated with the additional information received on (b)(6) 2020.Blocks h6 (evaluation conclusion code) and h10 have been updated based on the investigation closure date of (b)(6), 2020.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientifc corporation that a captiflex medium oval flexible snare was used during a colonscopy procedure peformed on(b)(6), 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the nurse manager called and reported a difficult polypectomy and she suspected that there might have been a perforation because the snare did not seem to cut all the way through and they had to pull the tissue away instead of cutting through it.Reportedly, it was unknown if there were interventions performed or treatment given to the patient for the perforation as no information was provided.It was not reported whether the perforation has been resolved.Although the procedure was reported to be completed, it was not reported how it was completed.The patient's current condition, is unavailable per customer.The hospital did not keep the device.*** additional information received on (b)(6), 2020 *** according to the complainant, the patient did not experience perforation.The physician kept the patient several hours after the procedure to make sure there was no complaints.The two polyps removed was at 70 cm.The patient was not put on any medication after procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block h6: problem code 1212 captures the reportable event of loop entrapment.Conclusion code 4316 is being used in lieu of an adequate conclusion code for device not returned.Block h10: according to the complainant, the suspect device was not kept and is not available for return.If any further relevant information is received, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a captiflex medium oval flexible snare was used during a colonscopy procedure peformed on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the nurse manager called and reported a difficult polypectomy and she suspected that there might have been a perforation because the snare did not seem to cut all the way through and they had to pull the tissue away instead of cutting through it.Reportedly, it was unknown if there were interventions performed or treatment given to the patient for the perforation as no information was provided.It was not reported whether the perforation has been resolved.Although the procedure was reported to be completed, it was not reported how it was completed.The patient's current condition, is unavailable per customer.The hospital did not keep the device.Additional information received on june 10, 2020: according to the complainant, the patient did not experience perforation.The physician kept the patient several hours after the procedure to make sure there was no complaints.The two polyps removed was at 70 cm.The patient was not put on any medication after procedure.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|