Model Number MC2-4590S |
Device Problems
Corroded (1131); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Structural Problem (2506); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
Event Date 05/13/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No product has been returned for evaluation as product remains in-situ.Radiograph provided confirms customers alleged event.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received that during the patient's second lengthening, x-ray images revealed the end cap had disengaged from the rod.There is no revision planned at this time.No patient injury was reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device is being returned to lirc.
|
|
Event Description
|
Updating report as revision procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2020.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No product has been returned for evaluation as it was returned to newcastle engineering lab.Radiographs provided confirmed the alleged event.Even though no product has been returned, fsca investigation was performed and variation in the torque applied to the threaded cap during the assembly process was identified as the root cause of the failure.Per the manufacturing instructions, the threaded cap must be tightened to 40 in-lbs.Although all operators followed the assembly procedure, and the torque wrench indicated 40 in-lbs was applied, the manner of using the torque wrench resulted in variances in applied torque.The manner in which the operator handles the torque wrench may impact the actual torque applied to the end cap, thereby creating a false positive that the specified torque has been applied.If the specified torque is not applied, the effectiveness of the cap tightening process may be compromised.
|
|
Event Description
|
The device was sent to newcastle university engineering lab for evaluation who reported that the rod was not force tested as the end cap was disengaged.With the end cap and its sealing o-rings not in position, the sealing mechanism was compromised.The internal components were noted to be covered with rust-colored debris.The radial bearing was in position, however, it could not rotate as it was seized to the magnet.Therefore, the leadscrew could not be separated from the magnet.No further disassembly was possible, therefore, the drive pin was unable to be analyzed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A review of the device history records (dhr) confirmed the device met all quality inspections and specifications prior to release.If any additional information is provided, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|