This follow-up is being submitted to relay additional information.Updated: b4, b5, d4, d10, g4, g7, h1, h2, h3, h6, and h10.Visual examination of the returned product found signs of repeated use (surface scratches) and the tip has fractured.Dimensional analysis of the product determined that the product, where measured, was conforming to print specifications.Device was submitted for further analysis.Analysis determined the device fractured due to bending overload.Eds semi-quantitative elemental analysis of the item showed that it was consistent with 455 stainless steel.Medical records were not provided.Device history record (dhr) was reviewed for deviations and/ or anomalies with no related deviations / anomalies identified.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|