Complaint-(b)(4)was reported to stimwave on october 2, 2019, and verified to be the same stimulator complaint through comparing stimulator serial number sections on issue-1507 (complaint-(b)(4)) and issue-253 (complaint-(b)(4)).Complaint-(b)(4)was captured in capa-(b)(4) as being reportable and requiring remediation.In complaint-(b)(4), the patient reported the same skin irritation caused by migration.At that time, no intervention was required, although the migration causing skin irritation does run the risk of erosion leading to potential infection.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient contacted the cr reporting that one of stimulators has migrated and is now visibly seen under the skin near the patient's groin.The patient was unable to provide any further information about the issue as she was not able to go to a hospital due to the covid-19 restrictions.On (b)(6) 2020, the cr reported that the patient still has both stimulators implanted and is scheduled for an appointment with the implanting clinician to discuss doing and explant.Patient mentioned that she was not having great therapy since the migration occurred.Patient does continue to activate the stimulators for intermittent relief after high activity.On (b)(6) 2020, the cr reported that it was unknown which of the two fr8a stimulators had migrated.Cr also reported that patient had been active prior to and post migration issue.On (b)(6) 2020, the cr reported that the patient had a revision done on the stimulator that had migrated.The cr reported that the patient was not reprogrammed and was doing well post revision.No further issues have been reported.
|
Stimwave quality has investigated the details for a reported skin irritation caused by migration, submitted to the stimwave complaint system on (b)(6) 2020, by clinical representative (cr), in (b)(6).Cr became aware of this issue (b)(6) 2020.
|