Without a product return, no product evaluation is able to be conducted.The lot number is unknown; therefore the device history records are unable to be reviewed.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report and/or a conclusion can be drawn, a follow-up report will be sent.
|
Additional information in b4, g4, g7, h2, h3, h4, h6: methods, results, and conclusion codes.The specified identity of the device was confirmed and the device was examined.Visual inspection revealed a portion of the tip has fractured off.Additionally, an x-ray was provided, the x-ray shows the fractured tip inside the patient.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed.There were no nonconformances or temporary deviations associated with this lot.All characteristics inspected upon initial receipt were found conforming to specifications.There are no indications of manufacturing issues which would have contributed to this event and the device was likely conforming when it left zimmer biomet¿s control.It was reported that during the procedure the tip of the tap broke off in the pedicle of the patient.The tip was not able to be retrieved.An alternate device was used to complete the case.The complaint is confirmed.The exact cause of this event can't be determine with the available information.
|