• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NAKANISHI INC. NSK; HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NAKANISHI INC. NSK; HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL Back to Search Results
Model Number X85
Device Problems Overheating of Device (1437); Temperature Problem (3022)
Patient Problems Burn(s) (1757); Injury (2348); Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 06/06/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
When nakanishi visited the dental office on june 9, 2020, the dentist refused to provide any information about the patient.Upon receiving the device involved in the mdr event, nakanishi conducted a failure analysis of the returned device that included measuring the operating temperature of the device [report no.(b)(4)].These activities are described in more detail below.Methodology used: nakanishi examined the device history record and the repair history for the subject x85 device [serial number (b)(4)].There were no problems observed during the manufacturing or testing noted in the dhr.The repair history showed 1 service record (january 2015) since the device was shipped.According to the service record, after repairing the handpiece (replacement of cartridge), nakanishi performed all of the necessary operation checks and confirmed that all of the criteria were met.Nakanishi conducted temperature testing of the returned device in the following manner: temperature sensors were attached to the exterior of the device at various test points.This included the point most proximal to the patient (testing point (1)) and points further toward the distal end of the device (testing points (2) through (4)).The test setup was prepared to take temperature measurements at all points simultaneously, including a reference measurement at ambient room temperature.Nakanishi attached a thermocouple (sensor to measure temperature) to each of the testing points.Nakanishi rotated the device's motor at 40,000 min-1, which is the maximum rpm for the motor that drives the handpiece (200,000 min-1 for the handpiece), with water spray, and measured the exothermic response.Nakanishi measured the temperature rise of the returned handpiece set at 200,000 min-1 (motor revolution 40,000 min-1).Nakanishi observed an abnormal temperature rise at test points (1) and (2) a few seconds into the test.Temperature measurements 18 seconds after the start of the test were as follows: test point (1): 72.3 degrees c.Test point (2): 86.0 degrees c.Test point (3): 29.5 degrees c.Test point (4): 28.3 degrees c.The rise in temperature was so sudden that the test was concluded 18 seconds into the planned 5- minute evaluation period.Identification of the specific failure mode(s) and/or mechanism(s) of the associated device components was conducted as follows: nakanishi disassembled the handpiece and performed a visual inspection of the internal parts.Nakanishi observed the following phenomena: the ball bearing on the rear side of the cartridge was abraded.There was debris on the other parts.Nakanishi took photographs of all of the disassembled parts and kept them in investigation report # (b)(4).Conclusions reached based on the investigation and analysis results: nakanishi identified that the cause of the overheating of the returned device was abnormal resistance during rotation due to the abraded bearing.Nakanishi considers the possibility from many years of experience that the cause of the abraded bearing was the ingress of undesirable materials into the bearing.A lack of maintenance caused the accumulation of debris on the internal parts, which caused debris ingress into the bearing during rotation.This contributed to the handpiece overheating.In order to prevent a recurrence of the handpiece overheating, nakanishi took the following actions: nakanishi reviewed the operation manual and reconfirmed the clarity and understandability of the instructions.Nakanishi will report the above evaluation results to the dentist, and remind the dentist of the importance of maintenance and checking of the handpiece prior to use to prevent overheating as instructed in the operation manual.
 
Event Description
On june 8, 2020, nakanishi received a phone call from a dealer about an nsk handpiece overheating.On june 9, 2020, nakanishi visited the dental office for further information about the event.The details nakanishi obtained from the communication with the dentist are as follows: the event occurred on (b)(6) 2020.The dentist was breaking a bridge covering from #3 to #5 of the patient's upper right jaw using the x85 handpiece (serial no.(b)(4)).The patient was not under anesthesia.During the procedure, the handpiece overheated and burned the right corner of the patient's mouth.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NSK
Type of Device
HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA  322-8666
Manufacturer (Section G)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA   322-8666
Manufacturer Contact
kenneth block
800 e campbell rd.
suite 202
richardson, tx 
4809554
MDR Report Key10193807
MDR Text Key204001284
Report Number9611253-2020-00030
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EGS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K972569
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,other
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/25/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberX85
Device Catalogue NumberC614
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/09/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/08/2020
Initial Date FDA Received06/25/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/11/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-