Investigation summary: product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device history: part number: 387.34, connical extraction screw, lot number: u321447 (non-sterile), lot quantity: (b)(4) total.Manufacturing location: supplier: (b)(4), inspected and released by: (b)(4), release to warehouse date(s): 13-nov-2018, quantity (b)(4), 19-nov-2018 quantity (b)(4), 15-jan-2019 quantity (b)(4).Purchased finished goods travelers met all in inspection acceptance criteria.Certificates of conformance supplied by (b)(4) dated 02-nov-2018 were reviewed and determined to be conforming.Hardness specified at 50-55 hrc and results certified at 51.46 hrc.Inspection sheets, met all inspection acceptance criteria.Packaging / labeling was verified during inspection per inspection sheet requirements.This lot met all visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the inspection or release of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.This lot met all visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the inspection or release of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
It was reported that during a hardware removal of a smith and nephew intertan nail on (b)(6) 2020, one of the head of the intertan lag screws broke during the removal process.A series of multiple attempts to extract the lag screw was made but unsuccessful.The surgeon decided to do a proximal femur replacement which involved cutting the nail out due to not being able to remove the intertan nail.During the process an instrument from the screw removal was used to try to remove the lag screw but the tip of the reported conical extraction screw broke off into the lag screw.All of the broken fragments of the conical extraction screw were removed easily from the patient.The broken screw removal tool did not cause any disruption or harm to the patient or change the course of the procedure.The procedure was successfully completed without a surgical delay.Concomitant device reported: unknown lag screw (part # unknown, lot # unknown, quantity 1) this is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|