• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Device Problem Stretched (1601)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/10/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The product lot number was not provided, therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2020-00886, 3005168196-2020-00887.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the posterior cerebral artery (pca) using a penumbra system jet 7 reperfusion catheter (jet7), a penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68), a non-penumbra microcatheter, a non-penumbra sheath and a rotating hemostasis valve (rhv).During the procedure, the physician made a pass using the jet7 and ace68.Upon removal of the jet7 and ace68, the devices became stretched while passing through the rhv.Therefore, the jet7 and ace68 were no longer used in the procedure.A second jet7 was successfully used to make another pass.While retracting the jet7 out of the same rhv, the same issue occurred.It was reported that the rhv was too small; therefore, the rhv and jet7 were no longer used in the procedure.Next, a third jet7 was used with the same microcatheter and a new rhv to successfully complete another pass.Upon removal of the jet7 from the rhv, after successful completion of the procedure, the jet7 stretched and the coil wind came apart.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the posterior cerebral artery (pca) using a penumbra system jet 7 reperfusion catheter (jet7), a penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68), a non-penumbra microcatheter, a non-penumbra sheath and a rotating hemostasis valve (rhv).During the procedure, the physician made a pass using the jet7.Upon removal, the jet7 became stretched while passing through the rhv.Therefore, the jet7 was no longer used.Next, while using an ace68 the same issue occurred.Therefore, the ace68 was no longer used.A second jet7 was successfully used to make another pass.While retracting the jet7 out of the same rhv, the same issue occurred.It was reported that the rhv was too small; therefore, the rhv and jet7 were no longer used in the procedure.Next, a third jet7 was used with the same microcatheter and a new rhv to successfully complete another pass.Upon removal of the jet7 from the rhv, after successful completion of the procedure, the jet7 stretched and the coil wind came apart.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following sections was incorrectly reported on the initial mfr report and is being corrected on this follow-up #01 mfr report:3005168196-2020-00888.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 1.3005168196-2020-00886, 2.3005168196-2020-00887.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key10228172
MDR Text Key197557781
Report Number3005168196-2020-00888
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K173761
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,06/10/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/03/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received01/14/2005
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-