• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Model Number 5MAXJET7KIT-B
Device Problems Stretched (1601); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/13/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the left internal carotid artery (ica) using a penumbra system jet 7 reperfusion catheter (jet7), penumbra system 3max reperfusion catheter (3maxc), and guide catheter.It was noted that the patient¿s anatomy was severely tortuous in the abdomen.During the procedure, the physician experienced resistance while advancing a guidewire, 3maxc, and jet7 through the balloon catheter.Therefore, the guidewire, 3maxc and, jet7 were removed.It was a reported that while flushing the jet7 on the back table, the jet7 expanded approximately 20mm from the distal tip.The physician then advanced a non-penumbra microcatheter through the guide catheter; however, resistance was encountered while advancing through the tortuous vessels.Therefore, the microcatheter and guide catheter were removed.It was also reported that the guide catheter was found to be kinked on the back table.The physician was unable to complete the procedure using other devices and decided to end the procedure at this point.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the distal shaft of the jet7 was stretched approximately 129.5 cm from the hub.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned jet7 confirmed that the distal shaft of the catheter expanded while being flushed.Further evaluation of the device revealed that the distal shaft was stretched.If the jet7 is forcefully manipulated against resistance, damage such as stretching may occur.During the functional test, a demonstration microcatheter could not be advanced through the returned jet7, and the returned jet7 could not be advanced through a demonstration neuron max due to the stretched distal shaft on the returned jet7.Penumbra catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key10242660
MDR Text Key197915948
Report Number3005168196-2020-00896
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948020962
UDI-Public00815948020962
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K190010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,06/15/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/07/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/18/2022
Device Model Number5MAXJET7KIT-B
Device Catalogue Number5MAXJET7KIT
Device Lot NumberF93169
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/22/2020
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received07/09/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age85 YR
-
-