Pma/510(k) # p050017/s006.Device evaluation: the unknown device of unknown lot number involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document based investigation was conducted.Lab evaluation ¿ n/a.Document review: as the rpn and lot number of the complaint stents are unknown, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.However, prior to distribution zfv6 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.It should be noted that stent strut fracture is listed as a known potential adverse event within the instructions for use ifu0058-4.There is no evidence to suggest the user did not follow the ifu.Image review ¿ n/a.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed to difficult patient anatomy and/or stent fatigue.Difficult patient anatomy and/or location of the stent in the body may have placed excessive force on the stent contributing to stent fatigue resulting in stent fracture.It is possible that the stent coursed under a ligament in the anatomy or was placed at a joint (e.G.Knee joint or hip joint) contributing to stress and fatigue from joint flexion/movement.Summary: the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.Patient outcome is unknown however, clinical input suggests that the stent fractures would likely have required a form of intervention.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|