It was reported that the intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the patient's left eye due to the patient having a history of keratoconus, therefore, it is difficult to get accurate measurements.The lens was not the right fit for the patient after all.The patient had blurry vision and had a hard time reading.The incision was enlarged, unplanned sutures, and an anterior vitrectomy were required.The replacement lens was successfully implanted with a different model and lower diopter.No additional information was provided.
|
Additional information: section d10: device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: 7/13/2020.Section h3: device returned to manufacturer ¿ yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received in a specimen cup.Visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics, and that the lens was received cut in half, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during explant.The lens was also observed to be returned covered in fibers, which may have occurred during the handling of the lens after explant, and therefore cannot be confirmed to be related to manufacturing.Based on the return condition of the lens no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency was identified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured according to specifications.The search revealed that no similar complaint for this production order number has been received.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.As a result of the investigation, with limited information available, it could not be determined if there.
|