• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. TECNIS 1-PIECE; MONOFOCAL IOLS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. TECNIS 1-PIECE; MONOFOCAL IOLS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZCB00
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Capsular Bag Tear (2639); Vitrectomy (2643); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 06/15/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If implanted, give date: not applicable, the lens was removed/replaced within the initial procedure.If explanted, give date: not applicable, the lens was removed/replaced within the initial procedure.(b)(4).All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a tecnis intraocular lens (iol) was removed from the patient's eye due to a capsule tear upon insertion.An anterior vitrectomy was performed along with incision enlargement and sutures.The replacement is an ar40e 20.0 diopter iol.Although the treatment was delayed for 20 minutes, there was no harm or injury to the patient.No further information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device available for evaluation; returned to manufacturer on: 7/13/2020.Device evaluation: the product was received in its original lens case.Visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics, and that the lens was received cut in half, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during explant.The lens halves were received stuck together due to the dried viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned, and no cosmetic issues were observed.Based on the return condition of the lens no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency was identified.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.Historical data analysis: a search of complaints revealed no other complaints have been received for this production order number.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a quality product deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This correction mdr is being submitted to address inaccurate information in section f on the xml version of the previous submission caused by a software glitch in the transmission process.The internal non-conformance numbers for this software issue are nr-0148919 and capa-010215.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS 1-PIECE
Type of Device
MONOFOCAL IOLS
Manufacturer (Section D)
JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC.
1700 e st andrew place
santa ana CA 92705
MDR Report Key10274354
MDR Text Key198867180
Report Number2648035-2020-00501
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474531741
UDI-Public(01)05050474531741(17)240323
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
P980040
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,10/29/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/15/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/23/2024
Device Model NumberZCB00
Device Catalogue NumberZCB0000215
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/13/2020
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received10/25/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
-
-