Model Number G247 |
Device Problems
Failure to Convert Rhythm (1540); Under-Sensing (1661)
|
Patient Problems
Cardiac Arrest (1762); Loss of consciousness (2418); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 06/23/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this patient arrived at the emergency room (er) unresponsive and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) was performed.A review of the data from the patients cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) device indicated that the they experienced three (3) ventricular episodes on that day.All three (3) episodes exhibited device undersensing of the patients fine ventricular fibrillation (vf) arrhythmia.In one (1) of the episodes, anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) therapy was delivered by the device and then the episode ended but it appears that the patient was still exhibiting a fine vf arrhythmia that was being undersensed by the device.A review of the information and a consultation with electrophysiologists (eps) occurred and the device was subsequently reprogrammed later that day according to the direction of the eps.The device remains in-service.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient code 3191 is being used to capture the additional intervention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this patient arrived at the emergency room (er) unresponsive and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) was performed.A review of the data from the patients cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) device indicated that they experienced three (3) ventricular episodes on that day.All three (3) episodes exhibited device undersensing of the patients fine ventricular fibrillation (vf) arrhythmia.In one (1) of the episodes, anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) therapy was delivered by the device and then the episode ended but it appears that the patient was still exhibiting a fine vf arrhythmia that was being undersensed by the device.A review of the information and a consultation with electrophysiologists (eps) occurred and the device was subsequently reprogrammed later that day according to the direction of the eps.The device remains in-service.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|