Model Number LSMU1350626 |
Device Problems
Optical Decentration (1360); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Difficult to Advance (2920); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 07/01/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a manufacturing review will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.Expiry date (05/2021).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a stent graft placement procedure through the celiac artery, the health care provider (hcp) identified under fluoroscopy the covered stent was too long, therefore, the delivery system was retracted causing the stent graft to allegedly dislodged from the balloon delivery system.It was further reported that the hcp then measured the area where the stent graft had dislodged and found the stent graft was not occluding any necessary vessel.Therefore, the stent graft was expanded and deployed in place.The procedure was completed with this same device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a stent graft placement procedure through the celiac artery, the health care provider (hcp) allegedly had difficulty in advancing the device to the target lesion.The hcp positioned the stent at the desired location and pulled it back to deploy the stent, the hcp then realized that he wanted a different length stent as he identified under fluoroscopy that the covered stent was too long and therefore, tried to pull the stent back into the sheath and that¿s when it came off of the balloon mount delivery system.It was further reported that the hcp then measured the area where the stent graft had dislodged and found the stent graft was not occluding any necessary vessel.Therefore, the stent graft was expanded and deployed in place.It was also alleged that the hcp had difficulty in retracting the device.The procedure was completed with this same device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review:the device history record review was performed for the reported lot number and this lot meets all release criteria.The manufacturing review did not indicate any possible manufacturing issue that could be related to the reported event.Investigation summary:the sample was not returned for evaluation.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported device incompatibility, dislodgment , difficult to advance and retraction issues.The definitive root cause for the reported device incompatibility, dislodgment , difficult to advance and retraction issues could not be determined based upon information received from the field communications.Labeling review:the ifu for the lifestream product was reviewed and contains the following information relevant to the reported event: the event description states that the lifestream was being used in the celiac artery.This is off label use of the device.The lifestream stent is intended only in the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the common and external iliac arteries h10: d4 expiry date (05/2021),g4.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|