• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O. ENTERPRISE 9000X; BED, AC-POWERED ADJUSTABLE HOSPITAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O. ENTERPRISE 9000X; BED, AC-POWERED ADJUSTABLE HOSPITAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 9X22BW111BCAGB
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Arjo received a call requesting to service and repair the enterprise 9000x owned by new royal adelaide hospital located in (b)(4).There was no information regarding patient involvement.No injury was reported.When an arjo technician visited the customer, the bed was quarantined.Evaluation of the device performed revealed that there was a gap in the area of the c-clip responsible for keeping the radius arm in place and the frame was bent in the middle section of the bed.The simulations carried out by the manufacturer showed that two potential situations may lead to the reported issues (an unacceptable distance and frame bend) and consequently to radius arm detachment.The first one when the backrest is blocked with an obstacle in the position of 45 degrees.And the second one when an obstacle is put between the base frame and radius arm.Based on testing results, it can be concluded that the reported malfunction itself cannot lead to the radius arm detachment and bed collapse and if the bed is used according to the procedure described in instructions for use dedicated to the enterprise 9000x bed (ifu 746-591-en-3).Ifu warns: "when the bed is operated, make sure that obstacles such as bedside furniture do not restrict its movement¿.Based on the limited information provided and unknown circumstances in which the issue occurred, the exact cause of the reported issue could not be determined.In summary, the enterprise 9000x bed did not meet the manufacturer¿s specifications.There was no information regarding patient involvement forwarded to arjo.The complaint decided to be reportable in abundance of caution because of unacceptable distance and bend frame.
 
Event Description
Arjo received a call requesting to service and repair the enterprise 9000x owned by new royal adelaide hospital located in (b)(4).There was no information regarding patient involvement.No injury was reported.When an arjo technician visited the customer, the bed was quarantined.Evaluation of the device performed revealed that there was a gap in the area of the c-clip responsible for keeping the radius arm in place and the frame was bent in the middle section of the bed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENTERPRISE 9000X
Type of Device
BED, AC-POWERED ADJUSTABLE HOSPITAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O.
ul. ks. piotra wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki PL-62 052
PL  PL-62052
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O.
ul. ks. piotra wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki PL-62 052
PL   PL-62052
Manufacturer Contact
kinga stolinska
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki 62-05-2
PL   62-052
688282467
MDR Report Key10325140
MDR Text Key200505938
Report Number3007420694-2020-00123
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FNL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/27/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/27/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Model Number9X22BW111BCAGB
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/02/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/19/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-