• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION COMET; TRANSDUCER, PRESSURE, CATHETER TIP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION COMET; TRANSDUCER, PRESSURE, CATHETER TIP Back to Search Results
Model Number 8900
Device Problems Difficult to Advance (2920); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/26/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated mfr: the product was returned to boston scientific for analysis.Returned product consisted of an ffr comet pressure wire connected to the occ cable.The tip, device shaft, sensor port and the coefficient values were examined for damage or any irregularities.The wire showed 1 kink located 123cm from the tip.The tip showed bend damage.There was some slight peeling of the coating at the 123cm location.The occ handle was connected to the ffr link to verify the signal strength.The signal was present and showed green lights as designed.The occ handle was then connected to the bench top testing equipment and the wire was inserted into the pressure chamber.The pressure was increased to verify the sensor was indeed reacting to the pressure increases and decreases.The pressure sensor functioned as designed.The coefficient values were confirmed to be programmed.The occ handle was again connected to the ffr link.The device was then connected to the polaris (ilab) test equipment via bluetooth signal.The wire communicated to the polaris system and zeroed as designed.With the wire inserted into the test pressure chamber, the wire transferred a pressure waveform to the polaris which indicates a functioning wire.The wire was removed from the occ handle with no issues.The sensor port showed no residue of body fluids.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The complaint was confirmed for shaft and tip damage.
 
Event Description
It was reported that difficulty advancing and tip damage occurred.The 75% stenosed target lesion was located in the severely calcified and moderately tortuous right coronary artery (rca).A 2.0 x 15 emerge balloon was advanced to predilate the target lesion.A comet pressure guidewire was advanced to the target lesion, but could not pass through the angle due to a resistance.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported in relation to this event.However, returned device analysis revealed peeled coating.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COMET
Type of Device
TRANSDUCER, PRESSURE, CATHETER TIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
two scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634942574
MDR Report Key10358246
MDR Text Key201737227
Report Number2134265-2020-09790
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXO
UDI-Device Identifier08714729904397
UDI-Public08714729904397
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
K151610
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/03/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/25/2022
Device Model Number8900
Device Catalogue Number8900
Device Lot Number0025105827
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/11/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/14/2020
Initial Date FDA Received08/03/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/26/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age74 YR
-
-