• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET 7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET 7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Model Number 5MAXJET7KIT-B
Device Problems Break (1069); Stretched (1601)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/16/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2020-01133, 3005168196-2020-01135.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max), a penumbra system jet 7 reperfusion catheter (jet7) and a velocity delivery microcatheter (velocity).It was noted that the patient had type iii arch and an anatomy that was very tortuous.During the procedure, the physician advanced the neuron max until it was unable to be advanced beyond the carotid bifurcation.It was noted that the takeoff of the brachiocephalic artery was very tortuous.The physician then advanced the velocity over the jet7 beyond the brachiocephalic artery; but eventually was unable to advance them any further.The physician made several attempts to advance the velocity and jet7 further but were unsuccessful.The physician experienced resistance while attempting to retract the velocity and jet7.Upon removal, it was noticed that the jet7 stretched and the distal tip had broken off.The physician confirmed that the broken piece of the jet7 was lodged within the distal end of the neuron max; therefore, the neuron max containing the broken piece of the jet7 was removed.Upon removal it was noticed that the neuron max was kinked.It was reported that the physician attempted to continue the procedure using a new neuron max, a new jet7 and a new velocity, but was unsuccessful.The physician then attempted to complete the procedure using radial access; however, it was also unsuccessful.It was reported that the attempts were unsuccessful due to how difficult it was to access the target vessel.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET 7 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key10381128
MDR Text Key202097616
Report Number3005168196-2020-01134
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948020962
UDI-Public00815948020962
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K190010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,07/16/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/07/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/19/2022
Device Model Number5MAXJET7KIT-B
Device Catalogue Number5MAXJET7KIT
Device Lot NumberF95099
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received07/16/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/20/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age95 YR
-
-