The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the manufacture and expiration dates are unknown.However, it was reported that the device was not used past its expiry date.(b)(4).The complainant indicated that the device was disposed and will not be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on august 06, 2020 that a wallflex esophageal fully covered stent was implanted to treat a gastric bypass anastomotic stricture during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd) with stent placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, about two weeks post stent placement, the patient contacted the physician and complained of nausea.Reportedly, the patient was scheduled for an emergent follow-up the next day.X-ray was obtained and confirmed that the stent had migrated into the jejunum.On (b)(6) 2020, the migrated stent was removed from the patient using rat tooth forceps.Reportedly, in (b)(6) 2020, a different stent was implanted.Reportedly, the nausea is probably due to the stricture.Note: according to the complainant, the wallflex esophageal fully covered stent was implanted to treat a gastric bypass anastomotic stricture.However, per wallflex esophageal fully covered stent system directions for use, the stent is intended for maintaining esophageal luminal patency in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/ or extrinsic malignant tumors, and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistulas.Additionally, the wallflex esophageal fully covered stent system is contraindicated for placement in an esophago-jejunostomy (following gastrectomy), as peristalsis and altered anatomy may displace stent.
|