If implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.(b)(4).Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received stuck on the label of its original lens case.The original folding carton and directions for use (dfu) were received as well.Visual inspection under magnification revealed what appeared to be dried blood and viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics, and that the lens was received cut in half, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during removal and replacement.White fibers/debris were observed on the lens, which can be attributed to receiving the lens stuck to the white label of the lens case.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing process record was evaluated and revealed that the product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search revealed that no other complaints were received from this production order.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|