ARROW INTERNATIONAL, INC. (SUBSIDIARY OF TELEFLEX, INC.) ARROW FLEXTIP PLUS(R) EPIDURAL CATHETERIZATION KIT; CATHETER, CONDUCTION, ANESTHETIC
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number IPN045606 |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 08/10/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Per anesthesiologist, attempt at l4/5, os at multiple angles before lor (loss of resistance), unable to thread catheter smoothly.Considered thin epidural space at that level not suitable for epidural catheter.Attempt at l3/4, os at multiple angles before lor, again unable to thread catheter smoothly.Attempt at l5/s1, lor at 7 cm, epidural catheter advanced smoothly into epidural space.Resistance when retrieving needle, stopped pulling immediately on needle, and decided to pull needle and epidural catheter together.When needle removed, saw exposed inner wire from catheter.Pulled all of wire out.Compared pulled catheter to new catheter and noted approximately 5 cm of catheter presumed to remain in epidural space.Patient denied paraesthesias or neurological symptoms during all the attempts and after removal of catheter.Another catheter was placed without complication.Patient underwent cesarean section without complication.Neurosurgeon consulted.Ct scan order of the lumbar spine to determine the position of the retained catheter fragment.Ct scan confirmed presence of retained catheter at the l4-5 level, appeared to be epidural, left side extending into the proximal portion of the left l4-5 foramen.Laminotomy performed on [date redacted]- retained catheter fragment was successfully retrieved.Patient did well post operatively and was discharged [date redacted].
|
|
Event Description
|
Per anesthesiologist, attempt at l4/5, os at multiple angles before lor (loss of resistance), unable to thread catheter smoothly.Considered thin epidural space at that level not suitable for epidural catheter.Attempt at l3/4, os at multiple angles before lor, again unable to thread catheter smoothly.Attempt at l5/s1, lor at 7 cm, epidural catheter advanced smoothly into epidural space.Resistance when retrieving needle, stopped pulling immediately on needle, and decided to pull needle and epidural catheter together.When needle removed, saw exposed inner wire from catheter.Pulled all of wire out.Compared pulled catheter to new catheter and noted approximately 5 cm of catheter presumed to remain in epidural space.Patient denied paraesthesias or neurological symptoms during all the attempts and after removal of catheter.Another catheter was placed without complication.Patient underwent cesarean section without complication.Neurosurgeon consulted.Ct scan order of the lumbar spine to determine the position of the retained catheter fragment.Ct scan confirmed presence of retained catheter at the l4-5 level, appeared to be epidural, left side extending into the proximal portion of the left l4-5 foramen.Laminotomy performed on [date redacted]- retained catheter fragment was successfully retrieved.Patient did well post operatively and was discharged [date redacted].
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|