• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number RBY4C0415-B
Device Problems Break (1069); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/17/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the left internal iliac artery using a ruby coil and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).It was noted that the patient anatomy was tortuous and calcified.During the procedure, the physician experienced resistance while advancing a ruby coil within its introducer sheath; therefore, the ruby coil and lantern were removed.Afterwards, the physician advanced the ruby coil through the lantern several times on the back table and subsequently, the pusher assembly of the ruby coil broke, and the ruby coil detached within the lantern.Therefore, the physician flushed the ruby coil out of the lantern.The procedure was completed using another ruby coil, two pod packing coils (pod pcs), and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was damaged on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was kinked approximately 80.0 cm, 81.0 cm, 84.0 cm, and 86.0 cm from the proximal end.The pusher assembly was fractured approximately 79.0 cm, 88.0 cm, and 174.0 cm from the proximal end.The pull wire was retracted from the pusher assembly distal detachment tip (ddt) and the embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly.The embolization coil was not returned for evaluation.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned ruby coil pusher assembly confirmed a fracture and revealed kinks near the fractured location.If the device is forcefully advanced against resistance, damages such as pusher assembly kinks and subsequently fracture may occur.If the pusher assembly is fractured, and the pull wire is retracted out of the ddt, the embolization coil will detach from its pusher assembly.The detached embolization coil was not returned for evaluation.Further evaluation of the device revealed a damaged pet lock, and additional pusher assembly fractures.This damage was likely incidental to the complaint.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key10521411
MDR Text Key207375147
Report Number3005168196-2020-01438
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548018348
UDI-Public00814548018348
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K173614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,08/18/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRBY4C0415-B
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C0415
Device Lot NumberF98321
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/03/2020
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/18/2020
Initial Date FDA Received09/11/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/25/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/17/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-