• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 42MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 42MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 74121142
Device Problem Compatibility Problem (2960)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Loss of Range of Motion (2032); Injury (2348); Ambulation Difficulties (2544); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Event Date 01/05/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Plaintiff underwent medically-indicated revision of the bhr left hip implants on (b)(6) 2015.The patient revision surgery was performed due to severe pain, failed left hip resurfacing, elevated levels of cobalt and chromium, stiffness, loss of mobility, and metallosis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.As no device part and batch numbers were provided for investigation, a complaint history review, manufacturing record review and device labelling / ifu review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.Smith and nephew has not received the device/adequate materials to fully evaluate the complaint, but if additional clinically relevant materials are later received, then the case may be re-opened for further evaluation.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Event Description
Plaintiff underwent medically-indicated revision of the bhr left hip implants on (b)(6) 2015.The patient revision surgery was performed due to severe pain, failed left hip resurfacing, elevated levels of cobalt and chromium, stiffness, loss of mobility, and metallosis.The patient was discharged after 2 days in stable condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Sections a2, a3, b5, b6, d1, d3, d4, g4, h4 and h6 were updated according to the new information received.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: it was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr cup and head was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.Similar complaints have been identified for the cup and head and these failures will continue to be monitored.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.Device history record review confirmed that all released parts met specifications applicable at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.Per the surgical technique, the acetabular component is to be impacted with 15-20° of anteversion and 40-45° inclination angle.However, the implantation operative report indicated the acetabular component was implanted at approximately 20-25° anteversion.It is unknown if the increased anteversion of the acetabular component led to accelerated wear and the metallosis noted intraoperatively.As well, the patient¿s fall cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor to her pain and clinical status.The reported pain, stiffness, loss of mobility, elevated metal ions, and intraoperative findings of ¿moderate amount of greenish tissue¿ and pseudotumor may be consistent with metallosis.However, the root cause of the reported metallosis cannot be confirmed nor can it be concluded that the clinical reactions are associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.Based on the limited information provided we are unable to speculate the specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative action is not indicated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 42MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house
spa park
leamington spa CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
MDR Report Key10556043
MDR Text Key207601968
Report Number3005975929-2020-00345
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXT
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P040033
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/18/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/29/2012
Device Catalogue Number74121142
Device Lot Number077834
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/21/2020
Initial Date FDA Received09/18/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/22/2020
07/16/2021
10/15/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/25/2020
07/22/2021
10/18/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age46 YR
-
-