Correction: d.4 (model number, udi number).Additional information: a.3, a.4, d.4 (lot number, expiration date), d.6, d.9, h.3, h.4, h.6, h.10.The reported failure mode was confirmed.The rod was unable to distract with manual distractor & erc.Due to the current condition of the rod (jammed), force testing was not performed.The rod was sectioned, and debris build up was found, which may have caused the reduced functionality.Sectioning of the rod determined that it could not be separated from the housing without use of high force.The cause of the jam cannot be definitively determined but may have been the bending force applied on the rods during the distraction sessions.Additionally, the patient¿s daily activities and unique anatomical structure can influence the amount of force applied to the rod.Review of the device history records revealed no discrepancies related to this complaint.The rod was manufactured in accordance with the specified requirements and met all of the required quality inspections.
|