Only event year is known.Reporter is a synthes employee.The device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that on an unknown date, that the end of the screwdriver broke.Patient involvement was unknown.This report involves one (1) handle with quick coupling, small.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: reviewing attached picture, the complaint description can be confirmed that the top-part of the handle is detached.Visual inspection: the returned handle is in very used condition and shows wear marks and scratches on the surface of the whole instrument.The top - part of the handle is broken off.Based on the fact that the device had no lot number etched, the instrument is a very old device.Investigation conclusion: the complaint is confirmed as the top part of handle is broken off.The instrument is old and in a very used condition, this let us exclude a manufacturing related issue.The device must be more than 19 years old because the first registered lot number of this handle in our system was may 2001.As the lot number is unknown, we are not able to research the device history record and the manufacturing documents.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.The root cause was identified during the performed cq evaluation and therefore the in the investigation flow listed remaining investigation steps "dimensional inspection: and document/specification review:" are not required.End of life definition per important information leaflet, limits on reprocessing: end of life of a device is normally determined by wear and damage due to use.Evidence of damage and wear on a device may include but is not limited to corrosion (i.E.Rust, pitting), discoloration, excessive scratches, flaking, wear and cracks.Improperly functioning devices, devices with unrecognizable markings, missing or removed (buffed off) part numbers, damaged and excessively worn devices should not be used.No manufacturing related issue was identified and/or confirmed.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|