• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET 7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET 7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Model Number 5MAXJET7KIT-B
Device Problems Stretched (1601); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/25/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the jet7 was kinked and ovalized approximately 110.5 ¿ 112.5 cm from the hub.The total length of the jet7 was approximately 132.5 cm.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned jet7 was kinked and ovalized on the distal shaft.This damage was likely the reported stretching.If the device is forcefully manipulated against resistance, damage such as this may occur.During functional testing, the jet7 was advanced through a demonstration neuron max with resistance due to the ovalization.The root cause of initial resistance during the procedure could not be determined.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the left m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system jet 7 reperfusion catheter (jet7), velocity delivery microcatheter (velocity), and non-penumbra sheath.During the procedure, the physician advanced the jet7 into the target vessel and turned on aspiration for approximately two minutes.The physician started to retract the jet7; however, resistance was encountered and the distal portion of the jet7 started to become stretched.Subsequently, the physician stopped retracting the jet7 and started retracting the sheath which in turn started to move the jet7.The physician then stopped retracting on the sheath and pulled the jet7 to remove it with the clot contained at the tip of the jet7.An angiogram was performed to reveal that the clot was removed from the artery.Post procedure, the physician mentioned a vasospasm occurred in the cervical internal carotid artery (ica) related to the sheath and, consequently, caused the jet7 to become stretched upon retraction.It was also reported that no medical intervention was performed to treat the vasospasm.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET 7 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key10577806
MDR Text Key208951064
Report Number3005168196-2020-01549
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948020962
UDI-Public00815948020962
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K190010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,08/25/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/23/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/19/2022
Device Model Number5MAXJET7KIT-B
Device Catalogue Number5MAXJET7KIT
Device Lot NumberF95097
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/26/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received08/25/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/20/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age31 YR
-
-