According to the initial report received, "patient is participant #410 in the on-x aortic post approval study (pas).Adverse event is endocarditis attributed to strep oralis." this investigation will be relegated to onxane-23, sn (b)(4).Adjudicator review states, "prosthetic valve endocarditis under treatment.Adjudication form will be faxed after 9/3/2020".
|
Clinical/medical performed a review of the available information.Onxane-23 sn (b)(6) was implanted (b)(6) 2019 in the aortic position of a [patient].On (b)(6) 2020 (361 days post implant) the patient was diagnosed with endocarditis (infection).To date, the patient has been hospitalized and treated with medication; the valve is still in place.The instructions for use [ifu] for the on-x valve acknowledge endocarditis as a risk factor in prosthetic valve replacement.Because all on-x valves undergo a validated terminal sterilization process during manufacture, and because it has been almost a year since implantation, it is unlikely that the valve is the source of the endocarditis.The historical record shows an (b)(4) for endocarditis for recipients of rigid heart valve substitutes [iso 5840:2005].There is no indication that the on-x valve has failed to function as designed.Endocarditis is the root cause of the complaint.There is no indication that the on-x valve contributed in any way to the diagnosis.Should additional information become available, it will be reviewed and a need for investigation will be determined then.Risk management reviewed the available information.The on-x heart valve risk management file thoroughly identifies the process and product hazards for indication.Each individual hazard is mitigated and reduced as low as possible by design and process.Post production residual risk is communicated in the product¿s labeling and ifu.The root cause for this event is endocarditis; however, there is no indication the on-x valve contributed to this diagnosis.There is no indication that an error or deficiency occurred at cryolife and all risks identified have been mitigated as far as possible and residual risk is acceptable.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to cryolife is accurate or has been confirmed by cryolife.
|