The affected complaint device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a product analysis could not be performed.As device information was not made available, device history record , risk management review and complaint history review cannot be completed.According to clinical/medical investigation, this case reports that a revision was performed due to the wrong implant being used on the patient.Information regarding what type of initial procedure that was performed, as well as the requested x-rays and surgical records have not been provided.Therefore the patient impact beyond the revision cannot be determined.No further clinical assessment is warranted at this time.Should clinically relevant documentation be provided, this clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.There is no information that would suggest the device failed to meet specifications.A relationship, if any, between the device and the reported incident could not be corroborated.No medical documents were received for investigation.Therefore, no medical assessment can be performed at this time.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Per the senior author, none of the complications were implant related and were as the article implied, procedure related.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.We consider this investigation closed.
|