• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INTERLOCK-35; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INTERLOCK-35; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number 83786
Device Problem Premature Activation (1484)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/06/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.A visual inspection of the device revealed that a delivery wire, main coil and introducer sheath were returned for this complaint.The coil and delivery wire arms were not interlocked, the main coil and delivery wire were inside the introducer sheath.The introducer sheath was inspected and no anomalies were noted, the twist lock had been opened.A significant quantity of dried blood was observed inside the introducer sheath.The main coil was found kinked and stretched, besides, the fiber bundles had blood residues.The coil interlocking arm was detached.Functional inspection was performed.The delivery wire was advanced through the introducer sheath, but it was not possible to continue advancing it due to the main coil was stuck; it was necessary to cut the introducer sheath in order to release the main coil.Microscopic inspection of the delivery wire revealed that the proximal end has a smooth surface and the interlocking arm was found in good condition while for the main coil the zap tip has a smooth surface and the interlocking arm was detached.Dimensional inspection of the delivery with the overall dimension (od) of the weld, wire arm and wire zap tip matches with specification.For the main coil, the zap tip (od) and the primary coil (od) matches the specification while the number of distal and proximal fiber bundles did not match the specification.
 
Event Description
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 29 sep 2020.It was reported that the coil prematurely deployed.The target lesion area was located in a moderately tortuous arteriovenous malformation.A 12mm x 20cm interlock-35 was selected for an embolization procedure.During the procedure, it was noted that the coil deployed before reaching the lesion.The coil was removed with the microcatheter.The procedure was completed with a different device.No patient complications were reported.The patient's condition was good post procedure.However, device analysis revealed that the coil interlocking arm was detached and fiber bundles were missing.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERLOCK-35
Type of Device
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORK LIMITED
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
two scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634942574
MDR Report Key10607740
MDR Text Key209224606
Report Number2134265-2020-13497
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier08714729793175
UDI-Public08714729793175
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
K133208
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/30/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/30/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/20/2021
Device Model Number83786
Device Catalogue Number83786
Device Lot Number0022686062
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/08/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/29/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/21/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age50 YR
-
-