SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX ULTRA PK 4.5MM W/2 UB -WHT &BL; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 72202595 |
Device Problem
Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 09/09/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, during a shoulder surgery, when the surgeon was implanting the "twinfix suture anchor (pk 4.5mm)" into the patient shoulder, a piece of the handle near the screw broke inside the patient when it was being screwed-in.The surgeon was unable to retrieve the metal piece as it is attached to the anchor.Therefore, the metal piece remained inside the patient's anatomy.Although the procedure was completed with the same device, the surgeon stated "most of the anchor is inside the bone, but a little piece of the metal is sticking out".It is unknown if there was a surgical delay and no further complications were reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, during a shoulder surgery, when the surgeon was implanting the "twinfix suture anchor (pk 4.5mm)" into the patient shoulder, a piece of the handle near the screw broke inside the patient when it was being screwed-in.The surgeon was unable to retrieve the metal piece as it is attached to the anchor.Therefore, the metal piece remained inside the patient's anatomy.Although the procedure was completed without significant delay using the same device; the surgeon stated "most of the anchor was inside the bone, but a little piece of the metal was sticking out".No additional complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: h3,h6: the reported device, used in treatment, was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat event.A review of risk management files found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.The instruction for use was reviewed and was found to outline precautionary statements and instructions in regards to the use of the device to avoid damage or non-functionality.A review of this complaint case revealed the broken inserter was left in the implanted anchor.No clinically relevant supporting documentation was provided for inclusion in a medical investigation.Therefore, no further medical assessment is warranted.There is no indication that the material did not meet these requirements prior to release to distribution.A relationship, if any, between the subject device and the reported event could not be determined.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this evaluation will be reopened for investigation.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|