MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC VASOVIEW HEMOPRO 2; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number VASOVIEW HEMOPRO 2 |
Device Problems
Thermal Decomposition of Device (1071); Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 09/11/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Trackwise id # (b)(4).A lot history record review was completed for the reported product lot number.There were no ncmr¿s for the reported lot number.The device has been returned to the factory and is being evaluated.A supplemental report will be submitted when the evaluation is completed.
|
|
Event Description
|
The hospital reported that during an endoscopic vein harvesting procedure using vasoview hemopro 2, for cauterization of ra bifurcated blood vessels, use 3 times (3) for cauterization for 5 to 10 seconds.From the impression that the degree of cauterization was weak, the (4th) cauterization was sufficient.They could not do it.They took it out of the body, wiped the tip of the jaw with a gauze soaked in water, and tried to reuse it.It wasn't enough.The evh surgeon was doctor, who is accustomed to hemopro2, and it was judged that the cauterization was insufficient in comparison with the normal use (cauterization).In addition, this time, after cauterization, carbonization (burnt) was seen at the tip of the jaw.The procedure was completed with the same device.The hospital did not report any patient effects.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint number: (b)(4).The device was returned to the factory for evaluation on 10/01/2020.An investigation was conducted on 10/09/2020.A visual inspection was conducted.Signs of clinical use and no evidence of blood was observed.The heater wire was observed to be intact, no visual defects were observed.The clear silicone insulation on both the cold and hot jaws was observed to be intact, no visual defects were observed.No thermal decomposition of the device was observed.A pre-cautery test was performed per the direction for use (dfu) with a reference cable, adapter and reference power supply vh-3010 at level 3.0.The device passed the pre-cautery test; it produced visible steam and heat during ten (10) 3-second activations and shut off when the toggle was released.To evaluate the safety shut down system, a polyfuse activation test was performed 5 times over 10 minutes.The device shut off after the period of sustained activation and reactivated after 10-second cooling period with no incident each time.An activation and transection capability test was performed over five (5) repetitions using "max life test method.The device activated and transected tissue five (5) times with no cautery failure observed.A temperature and resistance evaluation was conducted to evaluate the device function.The resistance value measured at 0.68 ohms which is within hemopro 2 final test specification.The device pass the temperature measurement test.The displayed temperature increase and turned ¿green¿ within the 2 second specified timeframe.The displayed temperature decreased once the toggle swivel was released.Based on the results of the evaluation, the complaint for the reported failures "electrical issue" and "thermal decomposition of device" was not confirmed.
|
|
Event Description
|
The hospital reported that during an endoscopic vein harvesting procedure using vasoview hemopro 2, for cauterization of ra bifurcated blood vessels, use 3 times (3) for cauterization for 5 to 10 seconds.From the impression that the degree of cauterization was weak, the 4th (4th) cauterization was sufficient.They could not do it.They took it out of the body, wiped the tip of the jaw with a gauze soaked in water, and tried to reuse it.It wasn't enough.The evh surgeon was dr, who is accustomed to hemopro2, and it was judged that the cauterization was insufficient in comparison with the normal use (cauterization).In addition, this time, after cauterization, carbonization (burnt) was seen at the tip of the jaw.The procedure was completed with the same device.The hospital did not report any patient effects.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|