• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US VAPR COOLPULSE90 ELECTRODE; ENDOSCOPIC ELECTROSURGICAL ELECTRODE, BIPOLAR, SINGLE USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US VAPR COOLPULSE90 ELECTRODE; ENDOSCOPIC ELECTROSURGICAL ELECTRODE, BIPOLAR, SINGLE USE Back to Search Results
Model Number 228146
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 09/02/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint #: (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Initial reporter phone number: (b)(6).Udi: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported by the affiliate the tip of the electrode broke and migrated within the patient's shoulder during shoulder arthroscopy.It was not possible to find it (presence of a foreign body in the patient).A radiography of the patient's shoulder had been performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: the complaint device was not returned after multiple attempts for device return and the tip of the device is present in the patient, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.With the information provided, and without the complaint device to evaluate, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: (u1909005), and no non-conformances were identified.Should the device ever be received back in the future, this complaint file will be reopened at that time and an evaluation will be performed and documented.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary according to the information provided, it was reported that the tip of the electrode broke and migrated within the patient's shoulder.The complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual observations confirm that metal tip was detached form the electrode.In addition, the cable for connection and suction cable were found defectives, due to were cutted.The complaint can be confirmed.The reported active metal tip broken was investigated via a supplier capa investigation (cap-101220) and design and process improvements were implemented as a result.The most probable root causes for the capa-101220 failure mode (separation of the complete active tip) are the following: the weld bridge on active suction tube is not providing sufficient weld material and retention, mechanical fatigue due to stress corrosion pitting / corrosion and due to welding process, misuse, (eg.Extended activation or overloading of mechanical forces).We cannot determine a specific root cause for the failure.The capa has been closed in july 2015 due to a number of process improvements and design changes.The new design for the active suction tube was proposed with a wider weld bridge, raised side walls around the suction port and a smaller suction port length, all to improve the mechanical robustness of the active suction tube design and tip retaining function.The lot number of this device indicated that it was manufactured after the design change was implemented.The design change is intended to help reduce the occurrence of this failure.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number:u1909005, and no non-conformances were identified.Depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d10, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VAPR COOLPULSE90 ELECTRODE
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC ELECTROSURGICAL ELECTRODE, BIPOLAR, SINGLE USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
MDR Report Key10621841
MDR Text Key209769490
Report Number1221934-2020-02852
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
UDI-Device Identifier10886705010080
UDI-Public10886705010080
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K113545
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,o
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/17/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/02/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2022
Device Model Number228146
Device Catalogue Number228146
Device Lot NumberU1909005
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/16/2020
Date Manufacturer Received11/20/2020
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-