Due to the automated mes system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.There was no packaging returned with the device, therefore it cannot be confirmed that the correct device was returned.On visual inspection, the stent was returned in its deployed state, with no anomalies noted.There was a kink to the delivery catheter shaft at 20cm from the distal end.The distal taper tip of the stabilizer was kinked.On functional testing, the delivery catheter was hydrated and there was some friction while advancing & retracting the stabilizer.The distal taper tip was cut off in order to remove and analyze the stabilizer and catheter id.The reported issue is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported issue is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the reported issue.As per the additional information the patients anatomy was severely tortuous.The device was returned for analysis and the damage noted is indicative of the reported event.It is probable that the device was damaged due to the friction experienced during navigation through the patients anatomy causing the reported event and the damage noted to the returned device.An assignable cause of procedural factors will be assigned to the reported stent failed/unable to deploy and to the analyzed stent deployed prematurely during use, stent delivery catheter kinked/bent, stent stabilizer kinked/bent and stent stabilizer/catheter friction, as the issue is associated with a product that meets stryker design and manufacture specifications and was used in according with the dfu but due to procedural and/or anatomical factors during use, the product performance was limited.
|
It was reported that during the procedure, the subject stent was delivered to the lesion and prepared to deploy.However when deploying, resistance was encountered and the subject stent was unable to be deployed.After several tries the physician removed it from the patient's anatomy and replaced it with another stent without any clinical consequences to the patient due to this event.The subject stent was returned for analysis and it was discovered that the stent deployed prematurely during use.
|